Tuesday, December 22, 2009

better begin...in the beginning...

hmm
reading this again, it needs to be shorter...

I am interested in comparing notes on 'real experience of', (ie not 'belief in' or 'faith in'), the phenomena generally identified as 'god', ie/eg the non-magical, person to person god, as the source of the order and disorder of the universe, that takes part in the exchange that is often called 'prayer' - freely and without mankind's influence or constraint.
So far, the experience might be best described, as I know it, as the result of a 'tuning', a shift in consciousness, which, ideally - would, or one day will be, a continuous state, not one that has to be searched for.

I know it as a continual condition of disconnection and reconnection. My actual physical, daily world demands constant thought and attention, its complexity in extremes of delight and tragedy are often overwhelming, uplifting or heartbreaking.

Beyond my own daily life experiences, are those of my wider world, of people and places that I know respond as I and mine do, who face similarly - those same kinds of extremes - or greater ones.
Their lives change as mine does, they celebrate, they feel pain & their hearts are broken, as mine may be.

The experience of any sense of impending collapse, disaster, destruction - every kind of calamity, must be a common one.
Just as immense joy, delight, celebration, may be.

For myself - the tremendous turmoil of life, and many of its most awful aspects, might be intolerable, I have certainly found it to be so in the past, so that I felt driven to escape it all, and everything I know of it, somehow.
Yet there is no escape - always the relentless continuum.

However my most powerful experience, my reality, is none of that.
Instead, it is 'god consciousness', or the sense of stepping away from smaller concerns, to consider 'god', a god sensed as 'love', instead.
The experience is a powerful one in that there has appeared to be nothing that comes close to subduing it, and it brings answers, results, responses. Sometimes so uncanny that I feel that a 'fix' has been arranged, deliberately by someone who knows me well, but concerning things about which no-one can possibly know, or intervene.

But - no, none, not one response that I ever demand,
none that I can ever dream of.

Any sense of 'knowing better' than the experience itself, renders it useless.
I know that, and feel it as 'bad tuning'.

For it to be effective, I need to be in a state of mind that accepts my own complete unbounded, ignorance.
A state of mind that might compare to the landscape after an immense flood, or fire, with everything swept away, nothing recognisable.

Then I hold on to that state of mind, a reconnection, I know it as my most 'real' condition, not that one given by whatever my life seems to give me on any given day as a main protagonist, in a plot concerning 'one' - me, as large and significant,
but - I as a tiny part of infinity, microscopic, insignifcant, nothing at all, in the universe, far less than one microscopic star in the milky way.
Then I feel close to god, I rediscover my true nature, and feel 'seen' and heard, as I am, 'actually'.

At that time, in that state of mind, I can find my deepest, saddest thoughts and darkest feelings, all that seems to be my most impossibly glorious dreams, and needs.
I can scream and cry them, they can all be heard, they will be heard. They are shared with god.

It is the sense of finding the centre - the organiser, an 'other' consciousness,
one immense one, that contains my own.

'God consciousness' & the ongoing search for god, and god based structures, (religions) together with all the god debate, with rejection of god, appears to be universal, trans cultural and present in some of the earliest evidence of man, and might be assumed to be some kind of 'need' that must be confronted & met, in similar ways that the needs for all fundamental needs such as shelter or food must be.
It may be almost impossible for anyone to live on this planet, without being aware of 'god consciousness'.

That 'god thought' appears to be an inbuilt function in the nature of man, - does not appear to guarantee any kind of working relationship with any god, any more than the need for food and shelter guarantees a useful diet or a safe home. To find food or shelter, may be in some locations - very easy, in others
extremely testing, yet mans resilience and adaptability makes it possible for him to inhabit some inhospitable regions.

...to be continued...

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "God"?

    I suspect that for most humans across most of time "GOD" has been a designation of the superiority of and submission to the mastery of another percieved "being". A separate and somehow 'higher' entity or spirit.

    I have no experience of that and so cannot speak to it.

    I do experience a sense of 'membership', of being a small part of a larger whole, of everything. If anything is superior or determining to any extent of my experience it would be that.

    In so far as mind goes I find myself closesr to "the all" in the moment in the everyday but only WHEN I open myself to it. Less meditation than submission.

    I see no overarching plan or final summation, only continuum and the unfolding of endless varieties of life.

    (Life will escape the biological bottle I expect... Those who define lfe as inherently biological just as those who define God as inherently individual and separate will not accept the possibility.

    And I am in no position to say what is true.)

    The nature of advanced life is to seek guidance... the expectation is that guidance will come as leadership and intenful direction. Some will seek to lead for one reason or the other.

    What guidance I percieve is there to be percieved in all existance and at every moment. More perhaps when I escape what humans have constructed. only perhaps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very ancient blog posts came to light..the thoughts of hen..9 years ago. On experiencing god. I think imagining there's NO religion, is probably less effective than recognising the bits of shattered light shining through cracked lenses of all of them. That I belong to and am inseparable from *every*...xyz.
      seems to be very solid. Something I knew before ever giving it a thought or words. Years ago, I used to know that shocking fear of being "other"..unconnected..but referring to the speck that is me, and all, as one article, makes that fear vanish. It's total control of me.. in and as Universe+. From Shinto, I learned this lovely thing, of loving getting through via things. It isn't the thing itself that is living ..but the love that forged/stitched/planted/nurtured/
      moulded/glued/sang. Everything is there ..like a giant dinner service, serving love as dinner. Really little rubbishy things bring tears, sometimes. So tiny, so broken maybe, old shapeless, worn out..but still with the information built in. The love, even as a speck, a seed, that they carry!

      Delete
  3. Let me add, lest I be mistaken, That to my mind it very much seems that I DO experience of "God". It is more that I prefer to define God for myself. It is more that I prefer to define god, for myself, as the totality, the synergistic whole to which every thing in every dimension and universe belongs and to which everything eventually returns or accomodates.

    I find no humanity in that, no identity, no persona. God, as such delights in bricolage--a process of creation or construction relying upon the concommitant de-construction of a diverse continuum of available resources. Nothing is lost. Everything participates. Sometimes there is awareness and self awareness even identity and persona.

    It is possible to mount a human face upon such an entirety and I understand that desire... I just find it to be essentially misleading.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Henry Taylor wrote;
    "It is more that I prefer to define god, for myself, as the totality, the synergistic whole to which every thing in every dimension and universe belongs and to which everything eventually returns or accomodates"
    *******************************************
    You define god - for yourself. Please would you be more specific in how, having defined god, you '*experience*' god?
    More details? When, how, where, what part of you registers the definition and how do you
    relate/communicate/interact/. How would you describe the 'belonging', 'returning' 'accommodating'.

    ReplyDelete

use identity 'anon' or 'name/URL' for easy posting of comments - and add identification to your message if you wish.